MSU position on institutional statements: Thoughtful restraint
Michigan State aspires to practice thoughtful institutional restraint regarding statements on local, state, national and international incidents and current events. As an educational institution, our goal is to serve as a forum for debates, not proponents within them, with the highest value being the pursuit of truth. Institutional statements could unintentionally undermine this value, chilling academic freedom and dissent and silencing alternative views. Done too often, they also could distress the community, numb the community to leaders’ voices, appear performative and/or exacerbate the situation. In general, therefore, the university, its colleges and its departments should refrain from issuing institutional statements.
As drafters of the University of Chicago’s influential Kalven Report recognized in 1967, full neutrality may be untenable or inadvisable when our university’s very purpose is threatened. Judiciously, institutional statements could be needed to uphold the university’s position as a mission- and values-driven organization, in addition to modeling for students that MSU lives what it teaches: using persuasion and reason to stand up for core beliefs. Such moments include:
- Incidents that threaten MSU’s core mission of teaching, research and outreach; its commitment to free inquiry and academic freedom; and/or its strategic plans/priorities.
- Incidents that directly impact the broad university community, eroding MSU’s core values and/or commitment to nonviolence; undermining safety and well-being; and/or otherwise interfering with the pursuit of community members’ roles within the university’s mission.
To learn more, please see the president’s letter and the FAQs below.